Non-exclusive exclusion (Commentary on Capello et al.)

نویسندگان

  • Diego Rodriguez-Gil
  • Charles A Greer
چکیده

Beginning with their discovery by Buck & Axel (1991), a series of significant advances mark our increased understanding of odor receptors (ORs) and their roles in both odor transduction and axon coalesence (Imai & Sakano, 2008). Somewhat unexpectedly, the family of 1200+ ORs (Zhang & Firestein, 2002) found in the main olfactory epithelium exhibit little homology to those found in the vomeronasal organ where two families, of over 300 vomeronasal receptors (VRs) (Touhara, 2008) mediate pheromone detection. They differ in many respects, including the downstream transduction cascade, but share the elegant property of allelic exclusion, which results in any one sensory neuron expressing one OR or VR from either the maternal or paternal chromosome, but not both. While the significance of allelic exclusion in processing sensory information in the olfactory and vomeronasal systems remains unknown, the mechanisms regulating allelic exclusion are of intense interest. In this issue, Capello et al. (2009) address the question of whether mechanisms of allelic exclusion are similar in both the olfactory and vomeronasal sensory systems. They approached the question using a mouse model in which the odorant receptor M71, normally expressed in the main olfactory epithelium, is now expressed in the vomeronasal organ. This was achieved by using the promoter region of the vomeronasal gene V1RB2 to direct the expression of M71 in vomeronasal sensory neurons in lieu of V1RB2 expression. It was advantageous that M71 has a low percentage of identity with V1RB2 protein, or with any member of the V1R family of vomeronasal receptors. Previous results showed that axons from new M71 > V1rb2 neurons target the accessory olfactory bulb where they coalesce to form homogenous glomeruli (Rodriguez et al., 1999). Here, Capello et al. (2009) show that these neurons do not express the endogenous V1RB2 receptor or any member of the V1R family of genes. Because members of the odor transduction cascade are important in axon targeting from the main olfactory epithelium (Chesler et al., 2007) and, because the transduction signaling molecules used by main olfactory and vomeronasal sensory neurons are different, the authors then ask whether the expression of M71 also changes the expression of members of the transduction cascade. Vomeronasal sensory neurons express Galphai2 and TRPC2, while olfactory sensory neurons express Galphaolf, AC3 and CNGA2. Interestingly, M71 > V1rb2 neurons continue to express markers characteristic of vomeronasal neurons; it appears that their essential identity or phenotype is unchanged other than the expression of M71 in lieu of V1RB2. Capello et al. (2009) show, for the first time, that allelic exclusion in vomeronasal receptor cells can occur through the expression of an exogenous receptor and, that exclusion of expression is not limited to the substituted receptor, but applies to all members of the family – exclusion which is not exclusive. It is tempting to speculate that allelic exclusion may be regulated by universal mechanisms, as suggested by Cedar & Bergman (2008) in considering antigen receptor expression in the immune system. However, the nature of the cascade mediating the one receptor one sensory neuron rule in the main olfactory epithelium and the vomeronasal system remains elusive. While Capello et al. (2009) have shown that M71 effectively excludes expression of V1Rs, and that the axons coalesce appropriately into accessory olfactory bulb glomeruli, the reciprocal replacement is not effective; V1rb2 > M71 does not result in viable olfactory sensory neurons whose axons converge in the main olfactory bulb (Feinstein et al., 2004). Contributing to the challenge of understanding these mechanisms in both of these sensory systems is the size of the receptor families and understanding other molecular determinants of differentiation and axon targeting in main olfactory and vomeronasal sensory neurons. Despite many unanswered questions, the current paper from Capello et al. (2009) provides a new perspective from which to address the mechanism(s) of allelic exclusion, odor ⁄ pheromone transduction, and axon targeting. To paraphrase Shakespeare, would a rose by any other receptor smell as sweet?

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

An analysis of the concept and example of Kowsar and Abtar in the Commentary of Al-Mizan

Despite presenting approximately 26 examples for "Kawthar" in various interpretations, Seyyed Mohammad Hossein Tabatabai has considered the multiplicity of descendants of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) as the exclusive example of this verse. A review of the evidence shows that this view, despite its many positive points, suffers some ambiguities. Therefore, the scientific importance of Al-Mizan interp...

متن کامل

Modeling in Early Stages of Technology Development: Is an Iterative Approach Needed?; Comment on “Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling”

A recent paper by Grutters et al makes the case for early health economic modeling in the development of health technologies. A number of examples of the value of early modeling are given, with analyses being performed at different stages in the development of several non-drug health technologies. This commentary acknowledges the contribution of the paper by Grutters et...

متن کامل

The heme oxygenase-1 and c-FLIP in acute myeloid leukemias: two non-redundant but mutually exclusive cellular safeguards protecting cells against TNF-induced cell death?

S. Shirley1 and O. Micheau1,2 1 INSERM, U866, Dijon, F-21079 France ; Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Univ. Bourgogne, Dijon, F-21079 France 2 Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, F-21000 France Correspondence to: O. Micheau, e-mail: : [email protected] Commentary on: Rushworth et al .Oncotarget: this issue Received: September 16, 2010, Accepted: September 16, 2010, Published: Septem...

متن کامل

The Health Policy Process in Vietnam: Going Beyond Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Theory; Comment on “Shaping the Health Policy Agenda: The Case of Safe Motherhood Policy in Vietnam”

This commentary reflects upon the article along three broad lines. It reflects on the theoretical choices and omissions, particularly highlighting why it is important to adapt the multiple streams framework (MSF) when applying it in a socio-political context like Vietnam’s. The commentary also reflects upon the analytical threads tackled by Ha et al; for instance, it highlights the opportunitie...

متن کامل

Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: “The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access”

Citation: Montefinese M and Vinson D (2015) Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: " The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access ". Can the humped animal's knee conceal its name? Commentary on: " The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access " The representation of meaning is a pivotal topic for theories of languag...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The European Journal of Neuroscience

دوره 29  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009